Your diagrams are improving. There is a good consistency from one to another in terms of graphic quality and content. You would benefit from a little written blurb after each one which signifies what you have gleaned from the exercise. I find your diagrams, while visually stimulating lacking a bit in analytical content. It is not merely enough to trace circulation paths, for instance, but it requires more than a color coded type "A", type "B" dialectic. Which areas are thoroughfares, which are capillaries, is there a hierarchy to the circulation, are there overlaps, are there areas which draw in or repel due to some formal or spatial quality? These are all of the questions you have to address. There is a good start here, no question, but there is no payoff at the end. At least not yet.
Your diagrams are improving. There is a good consistency from one to another in terms of graphic quality and content. You would benefit from a little written blurb after each one which signifies what you have gleaned from the exercise. I find your diagrams, while visually stimulating lacking a bit in analytical content. It is not merely enough to trace circulation paths, for instance, but it requires more than a color coded type "A", type "B" dialectic. Which areas are thoroughfares, which are capillaries, is there a hierarchy to the circulation, are there overlaps, are there areas which draw in or repel due to some formal or spatial quality? These are all of the questions you have to address. There is a good start here, no question, but there is no payoff at the end. At least not yet.
ReplyDelete